Founded in 2008. The Landscape Juice Network (LJN) is the largest and fastest growing professional landscaping and horticultural association in the United Kingdom.
LJN's professional business forum is unrivalled and open to anyone within within the UK landscape industry
LJN's Business Objectives Group (BOG) is for any Pro serious about building their business.
For the researching visitor there's a wealth of landscaping ideas, garden design ideas, lawn advice tips and advice about garden maintenance.
Replies
We need to plant as many native trees as possible, they need to be much more regionally applicable even than the current provenance zones set out by the FC. The localised soils need to match the species.
On top of this major planting of conifers is required as well as coppice. Coppice will be as it has been since man colonised areas 10000 years ago up until only 100 years ago the only significant energy supply for heating and traditional purposes, dung come a close second.
I am always at a loss to understand the lack of planting trees in urban settings - the value of a tree blog goes into this area a bit - and the compelling research into the matter is impossible to ignore. But the powers that be do not want this principally because of CCTV.
Andy
Hamish said:
Andy
Hamish said:
Personally I believe the climate change is here - the swing south of the prevailing rains and wind has been in place now for three years. We have to lump it. Ignore the politicians they will never do anything particularly the latest crowd, loads to say but totally inefficient. But industry is well on track and we have to be optimistic. (we will all be dead of swine flu before it is a real problem anyway).
60 of the best, and what a range in my opinion.
A Forestry Commission bulletin (Creating New Native Woodlands) from the mid 90’s encouraged the conservation of local genetic distinctiveness and diversity through planting based on the natural distribution patterns of trees and shrubs on different soils throughout Britain. Certain rarer species were not recommended for planting as their distribution patterns are of intrinsic importance (e.g Small leaved -lime, Wild Service Tree). I read a grim description of tree species being able to persist along the edges of their natural distribution (long lived species can persist for decades under unfavourable conditions) as... “populations of the “living dead” which are in slow decline. To what degree we invest conservation efforts in these doomed populations is a critical question”.
Monitoring the distribution and health of native species (“sentinels of change”) is more important than second- guessing what species will be more suitable?
Which brings me onto the point of this reply – “look-alikes”. How much of a problem is the fact that many native plantings use material from abroad. I read that a many Field Maples Acer campestre are subspecies leiocarpum (which flowers a month earlier being from southern Europe). Areas planted with the native Dogwood Cornus sanguinea have been found to be C. australis from the Black and Caspian sea and C. koenigii from southern Russia and Wayfaring Tree Viburnum lantana mixed up with V. veitchii from China. To name but a few. It has been said that if these look-alikes function in the ecosystem in a similar way there is no problem. But if we are worried about how species will adapt/survive a fast changing environment don’t we need better information on what we are actually planting? Should we be more demanding from our suppliers about where the plant material has come from and should we be encouraging planting of true natives with the emphasis on monitoring and enabling a diverse system to adapt?
Now I’m wondering if I chose the right rootstocks for my apples. Oh dear.
This problem is set to get worse - there is now at least one, (it used to be very reputable), nursery here in Cornwall which is selling fruit trees which are not true to type and is ignoring many guidelines with regards the sale of other ornamental - I was told that a whitebeam was actually a poplar by the owner. How I wish I could name and shame.
As such I completely agree with Rubus - we should be asking questions, the general public should be asking questions too and there should be penalties imposed on those that are busy falsely selling before the flood of such people into the industry abates.
The FC and Defra to be fair have been hot on this subject and there has been levelled criticism towards elements of the Horticultural and Landscape Architecture industry in response - again this criticism falls flat when set against a disjointed industry and as with Swine Flu the results are that mitigation is the only weapon.
Certainly as and when planting is required I agree with the above in so far that for now it is best to stick to natives and to ensure provenance. but owners of these plantings have to be made more aware of the essential maintenance required in the long term to ensure the risks of disease or non native invasion does not occur.
Well if I find the idiot who keeps planting trees on our estate without bothering to even consult us I will happily hang them from the nearest tree that would take their weight.
Personally I look forward to reducing the number of trees we have, and bringing in a more diverse range which are much friendlier, both in terms of diversity and management.
I am no expert, but where I live much of the land is paved, cemented over etc, with wonderful systems in place to capture and remove rain, so only a small percentage is captured by the earth. Most of the open area we have is topsoil, earth with a wonderful bed of rocks and rubble. Under all this is wonderful London Clay.
Added to this was 169 wonderful large trees, plus a few that have been added. Some far too close to each other, others planted in raised flower beds.
As I said I'm not expert, but would assume as living organisms they require a good deal of water/moisture.
So heavily developed area, great system for moving water away from the area, and great lunking trees competing for the water available. Might explain why we have so many cracks in walls?
By no means do I want to get rid of all the large trees, and by careful selection of relevant tree they will be able to grow much more naturally than they currently are. I would like to see a bit more diversity in our trees, both in character but also in supporting a more diverse wildlife.