Founded in 2008. The Landscape Juice Network (LJN) is the largest and fastest growing professional landscaping and horticultural association in the United Kingdom.
LJN's professional business forum is unrivalled and open to anyone within within the UK landscape industry
LJN's Business Objectives Group (BOG) is for any Pro serious about building their business.
For the researching visitor there's a wealth of landscaping ideas, garden design ideas, lawn advice tips and advice about garden maintenance.
Replies
I have used 2 of them and the guy I sub for has ordered another one, good mulch but the under deck needs regular cleaning the side discharge is good but as a bagger they are pants in my opinion. Good speed but only one speed and on colder days you have to let them run a while before engaging the blades as they just stall the engine. Used every day and had no issues with them so far. Very heavy but wheels on full hight you can just tip it back put the front end in the van and the just lift the back in. Built like a tank hence the weigh, having not used a timemaster I can't' compare them.
I seem to remember a thread on here about them a couple of years ago.
From what I've seen on youtube, the guys in the US have had issues with the drive on them, but I understand this has been solved by Toro in later models.
Found it https://landscapejuicenetwork.com/forum/topics/how-big-do-you-go-to...
I had the turfmaster and sold it within a year. Also bad reviews on YouTube. It’s underpowered. 5hp Kawasaki. It’s not great at bagging or mulching. It has gator blades and it needs power to mulch well. I got the timemaster last year and absolutely love it. It’s lighter and more agile to turn etc. Bags in all conditions and mulches when needed very well. It also has the Briggs 1000 series 223cc Briggs which I saw online works out at 10hp. It’s a beast and in my opinion better than the turfmaster. I haven’t seen any updates to the turfmaster which Toro needs to think about.