Founded in 2008. The Landscape Juice Network (LJN) is the largest and fastest growing professional landscaping and horticultural association in the United Kingdom.
LJN's professional business forum is unrivalled and open to anyone within within the UK landscape industry
LJN's Business Objectives Group (BOG) is for any Pro serious about building their business.
For the researching visitor there's a wealth of landscaping ideas, garden design ideas, lawn advice tips and advice about garden maintenance.
Replies
We sought clarification on this as well from NPTC and our insurers. We were told that a pole mounted chainsaw did not need a license (although as Colin states there is a NPTC ticket as per most gear available).
The logic applied was that 90% of the risk to the operator was removed due to the distance between the 'dangerous' end and the operator, although you could 'take' down a tree using these, we don't tend to.
The remainder of any danger is covered by normal risk assessments (ie isolation area, not standing under branch ;-( etc etc).
I suspect this could change, but mainly via insurance co. requirements.
p.s. we use Stihl Kombi and chainsaw head attachment and not HT75's etc
From previous research, the CS48 was not a legal requirement, BUT your insurance company may override this and mandate it is required for your liability insurance.
The only mandatory requirement we found came from the PUWER 98 legislation and in particular chapter's 9 &10 - but they apply to any machinery provided by an employer for use by an employee - ie the equipment must be fit for the task and safe, employees adequately trained and/or experienced. This aspect can be gained on the job, skill transfer or toolbox talks.
HSE are not clear themselves on this subject and would not commit either way.
I think that if you have done a RA, Method Statement, are competent and showed a 'Duty Of Care' your would have no problem.
That is my take on the subject.....