PRO

Summer ball, Platt Fields, ManchesterAS landscapers or garden designers you are going to want potential clients see examples of your work by displaying photographs of your projects.

These could be simple before and after type shots, or close ups of particular methods you used, however, you also want to make sure people find them via search engines.

There are a couple of things you can do to make it easier for search spiders to find your images, but more importantly tell what the actual photograph is about.

Give your image a title

The first thing to do is to change the default name your camera provides once you have downloaded your image to your computer, often it is something like 'dsc00887.jpg' which doesn't tell us a great deal.

So after you have edited your image save the new one with a more descriptive name, something like 'rose-garden-norwich.jpg' as you can see this both describes the pic and offers up a location.

You'll see that I also split the words up with a 'dash' again this lets search engines read what the pic is all about.

If a search engine can find your image then so too could a potential client...which could lead to being commissioned.
A quick aside on editing the image.

Your camera software most probably has a simple image editor built in, or you may want to try Google's Picasa or the free PhotoScape, whatever you use try and keep in mind some simple dimensions for your photos.

Images don't need to be as high quality as in a magazine and many cameras, by default, provide an original image that if you printed it off would be about A4 size, clearly we don't need that on the web.

So I would suggest that your images don't need to be any more than about 500 pixels wide with a file size of around 75kb, you won't lose a great deal in quality.

I've loaded up the same image in two different dimensions to provide a comparison and to give you an idea of how little difference there is when viewed on a computer screen:

Large image of summer ball

Smaller image of summer ball

I also think this could help a little in reducing the illegal use of images by other websites.

For a start you could still include a website address in the bottom corner of your image as a type of watermark, but you are also not providing someone with a full size image that they can do want they want with.

I think the majority of people are pretty honest and will link back and mention the source of the image if they use it on their site - some won't, but they are crooks and whatever you try to do they will attempt to rip you and many others off.

To a degree as search engines improve and more people link to you, the person who has the original image or the more reputable online presence is likely to see their images appear higher in search engine results.

As you can see it's not an exact science, however, there is one last thing you can do to help your images be found.

Images also have alt tags, they look like this: alt="Rose garden" and you will see them when an image does not load properly.

The other tag connected with images is called the title tag, but it does not feature within the image properties on the network, but it is the one you see when you hover your mouse over a pic.

Again search engines use these to understand what an image is about, so if you wanted more locally based searches to prove popular your alt tag could read:

alt="Rose garden Brighton"

In fact I recently crossed a very useful article from Google themselves on improving your site for search engines, as well as the use of alt tags in images, take a few minutes to check out the video below.


Unfortunately the Ning service doesn't complete the alt tag automatically when you add an image to an article, it could use the image name for example, hopefully in time this will be the case.

In the mean time you can do it yourself, so once you've uploaded your image there will be a line of code and you will see, alt="" click between the quote marks and add a few words of descriptive text.

Don't stuff the alt tag full of words that have no relation to the image trying to trick the search engines, it won't work, all you need is a short phrase and maybe a location.

In the end though if you have taken a little time to write an interesting article or a helpful paragraph or two describing your image, this will help both search engines track you down but more importantly entertain and inform your readers.

Related article: Tips on using the Landscape Juice Network

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

Comments

  • That's a really useful article, thanks Craig. All I need now is a time machine to give me a couple of spare days to sort out my site! ;-D
  • PRO
    Hi Andrew

    Glad it proved helpful, might struggle to sort out the time machine I'm afraid ;-)

    All I would say to help speed things up is try and stick to a set formula; all images the same width, placed in the same way on pages, captioned in the same way.

    You can always go back into the page and make any tweaks during quiet times (although I must admit these seem less common nowadays!!!)

    All the best
    Craig
  • PRO
    Hi Stuart
    Both Google Analytics and StatCounter are good services.
    As you've most probably seen Analytics provides an endless amount of details, while StatCounter is good at providing a snapshot.
    Why they display different readings? Only the people behind the software would know that as their methods of measurement are different.
    Also you write that the tracking codes are on your home page, I might have read it wrong, but are you able to place the codes on all your pages?
    If you have a common file across your whole site, maybe your header graphic or left links, place the code here and it should measure traffic across the whole of your site.
    Hope this helps
    Craig
  • PRO
    Hi Dwayne, congratulations you spotted the deliberate mistake ;-)

    You are right, think I was full of alts, titles and tags at the time, I've edited the piece to correct the error.

    On the image resizing options, I have used Web Risizer in the past and I also noticed this one Resize2Mail - might have to write a mini post up about these.

    All the best, Craig
  • PRO
    I also use Picnik (a Craig recommendation to me a while back). Picnik has a great feature that lets you right click and edit a web picture or take a full page screenshot allowing you to crop out any part of the page without loss of quality.
  • PRO
    And converting comments into articles is one of my favourite tricks, so I've put together a short piece titled:

    Image resizing tools to help your photographs
  • PRO
    In case anyone is wondering where Craig is and why he hasn't posted for a while. It's because he has moved here to France and now lives about twenty five minutes from me here,

    We have had a couple of meetings thus far and we had look round the network together.

    Craig is still without regular Internet access.

    Naming images

    I am seeing a lot of photographs being added that do not have titles. I cannot emphasise enough how important this is for you (not me, YOU).

    Google indexes all images using the title tag and the alt tag so anyone searching for something in particular might just find your site if your image is indexed according to its particular topic.

    Please look through your portfolio and edit the title if necessary.

    Phil
  • PRO
    Please remember to add a title to your images. It means that the image is indexed for our own site search but it also means that the image is indexed on the WWW and can bring visitors to us, but more importantly you, if they are looking for related content.
  • PRO
    Not everyone is making the most of the SEO potential when adding photographs - please have a read or re-read of this blog post for some tips and pointers.
  • Hi Craig

    Thanks so much for this ...really useful and all in language even I can understand !

    Recently our old website was penalised by google (penguin update) as our seo guy was doing things wrong. We have had to build a new site at great expense and we are doing a lot of the seo ourselves : www.davidandersen.co.uk.
    Of course these things take time ...but tips like yours really help.
    Best of luck with life in France (I am jealous!) David

This reply was deleted.

You need to be a member of Landscape Juice Network to add comments!

Join Landscape Juice Network

Open forum activity

Intelligent Gardening replied to Marc Ollerenshaw's discussion Insurance
"NFU are very exensive but are very good when it comes to making a claim apparently... but hopefully never have to. I was looking for a combined policy to cover all insurances but according to my broker there isnt one so I end up paying a broker fee…"
10 hours ago
Amy is now a member of Landscape Juice Network
13 hours ago
Peter sellers replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Agree with you Graham, we have a client with a long run of Laurel which we only cut once a year mid june and have done for over 20 years, the client is fussy with a capital F ! It's a superb evergreen hedge which is bomb proof.
As to this so called…"
yesterday
Graham Taylor replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Disagree there!  I maintain a site with a couple of of large laurel hedges and one cut in July suffices and keeps it looking nice.  Agree.... looks nasty immediately after cutting but quickly perks up so you don't notice the cut leaves.  Pretty much…"
Tuesday
Duncan Neville replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Thanks Tim"
Tuesday
Duncan Neville replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Wow,  that's impressive !  Thanks"
Tuesday
Duncan Neville replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"That's pretty much my thinking, but I am seeing them more and more. Mostly at expensive new builds. Mostly people with very limited gardening experience wanting an immediate finished product. "
Tuesday
Kevin Harden replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Elveden Brochure Edition 3 (EMAIL).pdf
I hope this helps, if anyone has any hedging requirements, we are happy to help.
Regards,  Kev"
Tuesday
Brett Bouchard is now a member of Landscape Juice Network
Monday
Tim Bucknall replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Yes 5' actual instant shaped hedging is very expensive, but if that's what he wants he'll have to pay for it.  A good compromise is use individual plants- you could use 1.5m, but 1.8 or 2m plants would probably be bushier, and by trimming to height…"
Monday
Tim Bucknall replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"He needs instant 5' hedge."
Monday
Kevin Harden updated their profile photo
Monday
Robbie posted a blog post
Sunday
Anthony Toop replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Agree, nothing worse than driving past a new Cherry Laurel hedge planted too close to boundaries or buildings, and thinking they'll regret that decision in a few years time!
If a client really wants Laurel, i atleast try to push them towards the…"
Saturday
Kevin Harden replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Hi NevilleI would be happy to help and chat with you when you are free Elveden Brochure Edition 3 (EMAIL) copy.pdf
kevin.harden@elveden.com"
Saturday
Kevin Harden is now a member of Landscape Juice Network
Saturday
More…