Are so called professional body; the Society of Garden Designers, has forced through what I consider to be the worst piece of legislation in its pitiful 30 year history.It has decreed that from 2010, if you want to apply to become even a lowly corresponding member you have to submit work before a panel of your piers to be weighed, measured and no double found wanting!Its bad enough having to apply for full membership in this patronising and archaic fashion, but to expect potential probationary members to go through this as well is frankly bonkers.It doesn’t take a genius to realise that the whole membership thing is in a mess. Why is it that the membership ratio of full members to corresponding has never risen much above 1-10.That’s right; after 30+ year there are only about 180 full members of the society in the whole world! This despite consecutive councils trying their best to up the numbers.Councils discuss the same things and make the same mistakes time in, time out, like some giant horticultural ground hog day.They think by vetting the ‘newbie's’ and putting a 2 year time limit on them to apply for full membership they will improve things.Far from it! I predict the membership will fall further and the organisation will become even more redundant than it already is.In any other professional organisation, education is the route to full membership. Surveyor, engineer, architect, all have to have a first degree before they can apply.Unfortunately the SGD has been too much of a coward to go down this route, because so many of the founding members have a vested interest in the lucrative garden design education market.Take away the corresponding members and you don’t have a viable membership. So the Society has become little more than a Surrogate training centre for sub- standard design schools.It’s not until students have completed one of these lesser courses, that they realise how poor their training has been, only to be taken up by the SGD’s seminar program which in itself is a poor substitute for proper tutorage.Instead of this controversial adjudication panel, I propose the SGD introduce and examination. This could then be sold to the schools and colleges at a profit and would weed out those courses not capable of passing it.The colleges could then use there exam marks as a guide to the quality of the course.If they still wish to have a period of professional practice before full membership then so be it, but stop this lunacy before more of us give up on you and don’t renew our memberships.
Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

Comments

  • I certainly support Duncan's view that the SGD's membership statistics are appalling for a professional body aiming to be "the only game in town" and I agree that the membership category change is a bad move - but I disagree completely with his proposed solution.

    For me, the SGD should be a standards setting body, with its efforts directed to recognising (and thus rewarding) those design courses which have a syllabus teaching the procedures & practices of garden design to the required standard, and which have an externally-verified process for determining that its students have achieved the required standard. The SGD does not have the resources to be an examining body and should not waste what resources it does have trying to achieve this.

    I would go further and suggest we need a tiered, recognised (i.e. allowing members to declare their "bronze", "silver" or "gold" status), membership structure, which designers can progress through as they gain experience from continued professional development and professional practice - similar to that of other professions, or even OU-like "credits".

    I wrote a piece along these lines on the SGD Members Forum ("Professional Status", posted 27th August 2009) but, sad to say, it didn't raise a single comment either "for" or "against", so I have to conclude that the SGD membership is completely apathetic to debate of this nature and is only prepared to whinge and not seek positive changes.

    (If any non-SGD members would like a copy of my forum piece, please email me: BloomingG@aol.com)
  • Going to my forum in a few weeks time - not exactly feeling motivated it must be said. Rather annoyed about having to jump through these hoops when I should be spending the time earning money and running my business. My last college course expected work of the standard I am having to submit - wish that more courses were similarly rigorous. If the SGD could produce a suggested list of colleges that would be really useful - and would have saved me doing two previous courses first!
  • PRO

    It's been over three years since Duncan's post.

    Steve clearly has a different view to Duncan in respect of his proposal. What I'm wondering (and I'm sure others must also be interested to know) is, if anything, what has changed?

    Has the SGD merely bumped along since it introduced the membership changes or have there been real developments and cohesion within?

  • Unfortunately the SGD hasn't listened and according to my sums, have lost nearly 2 out of every 5 or their members since that article was written.

    At their peak they had a membership of around 1800 which is now down to little over 1000.

    I would imagine this has put them in a very difficult financial position with a magazine contract that should never have been signed in the first place and will now be hemorrhaging money.

    In hind-sight, they should have merged with BALI when they set-up their design category, as the SGD is too poor to publicise its members which is primarily what they want.

    I suspect that things are only going to get worse for them, as the building industry in the UK isn't predicted to start growing again until at least 2017.

    Garden design will remain in recession until at least then, and I will only be teaching new students via our online course, as I don't believe its prudent for students to give up a full time job in order to retrain as landscape designers, when they will only struggle to make a living after they graduate.

  • PRO

    "I don't believe its prudent for students to give up a full time job in order to retrain as landscape designers"

    An interesting comment Duncan. I don't know if you are right, or wrong, about the 2017 date but I'm pretty sure there's a recessional lag when it comes to new landscaping projects coming through.

    I know we all get frustrated by it but it's a fact that landscaping is still viewed as a major luxury by many with holidays and household luxuries still taking precedence.

    I would not hold you breath if you are waiting to see a joining of any of the associations but if it were ever to happen, it would result in a larger, but doubly weaker organisation afterwards.

This reply was deleted.

You need to be a member of Landscape Juice Network to add comments!

Join Landscape Juice Network

PRO Supplier

A recent school grounds seminar held at Charterhouse in Surrey has been hailed a huge success by all who attended.

The event attracted over 50 delegates from all levels as several topical issues were explored and discussed. Supported by…

Read more…

Open forum activity

David Benson replied to paul watson's discussion Chinese made equipment
"i bet you have machines that have got Chinese parts in them, most of the garden machines have had Chinese components in them for years"
4 hours ago
Graham Taylor replied to paul watson's discussion Chinese made equipment
"You won't be buying much then!!  I don't for one moment blame the Chinese for the virus.... OK, it started there but.they didn't "create" it on purpose and something similar could just as easily have started in any other country.... even the UK.  Ho…"
5 hours ago
Richard Gadsby replied to paul watson's discussion Chinese made equipment
"So you won't be buying any new machines then?
You will be extremely unlikely to find any machine out there that has no parts from China.
also having lived in China I think you may be surprised to find that 99% of Chinese are good people. They live u…"
5 hours ago
Andrew Liddle replied to Dougie's discussion Rear roller mower
"Have a look at the ‘Question of stripes’ discussion. I have the same question as you about the Weibang.  Still not fully decided, but leaning toward a Cobra Pro roller.  It seems whatever lawn mower you look at, there are good and bad reviews and ex…"
5 hours ago
Chris replied to Chris's discussion Mulching Mowers
"I very nearly bought a Toro SmartStow last year as this can be stored vertically, and I was looking to free up some space in my NV200 van, things can get a bit tight carrying two mowers and all the other gear."
5 hours ago
John F replied to Chris's discussion Mulching Mowers
"I wouldn't recommend the following machine for your purpose Chris but it would be a brand i would consider if i was in your position .
My first lawnmower and only machine when i started out seven years ago was a Toro recycler TX159 personal pace 48…"
7 hours ago
Ben Gilg replied to Dougie's discussion Rear roller mower
"My 48 Pro is just shy of it's 3 year commercial warrenty and currently sat in the dealers workshop as it's lost it's umph, new belts and drives in all 3 gears at different speeds but the top speed is slow as.
Whilst it's there I've been loaned a Hay…"
7 hours ago
paul watson posted a discussion
Hi everyone, Personally I would not be buying anything made in China, Because of the covid 19  virus I believe there will be a kickback at chinese products and thus availability of parts. Never mind conspiracy theories, the chinese have covered up d…
7 hours ago
GaryRK replied to GaryRK @ Landscape Juice Network's discussion The LJN Covid-19 Business articles / advice hub
"Corrected :)
 "
9 hours ago
Nick @ NM Garden Services Ltd replied to GaryRK @ Landscape Juice Network's discussion The LJN Covid-19 Business articles / advice hub
"Gary - your link just takes you to *this* page..."
10 hours ago
GaryRK replied to GaryRK @ Landscape Juice Network's discussion The LJN Covid-19 Business articles / advice hub
"Perennial Coronavirus COVID-19 news update (3 April 2020).docx"
10 hours ago
Richard Matthews replied to Richard Matthews's discussion Stolen Logo
"Hi
Yeah ive had it before, someone in Scotland took the design,  solicitor told me not to bother, just infuriates me that people think its ok. Dont know where he got it but website is copyrighted so he may have got it from there or just plain old go…"
14 hours ago
Jonathan Davidson replied to Richard Matthews's discussion Stolen Logo
"Hello Richard,
 
are you in warwickshire and he in West Sussex, that is quite a way away from you not to cause any issues. I don’t have any set logos etc as sole trader so can’t advise on the use of them  but only the other day I was admiring yours…"
15 hours ago
Dougie posted a discussion
Hi i am looking to buy a rear roller lawnmower i have been looking at weibang legacy 48 pro lawnmower ans am wondering if there a better option than the weibang
15 hours ago
Dougie is now a member of Landscape Juice Network
16 hours ago
Andrew Watts replied to Richard Matthews's discussion Stolen Logo
"The logo is on the internet, it's not trademarked or images copyrighted. So I don't think it's something that (a) you can do anything about, and (b) shouldn't be too worried about either. It's only a logo and it's far enough away.
I would send him a…"
18 hours ago
More…

Chinese made equipment

Hi everyone, Personally I would not be buying anything made in China, Because of the covid 19  virus I believe there will be a kickback at chinese products and thus availability of parts. Never mind conspiracy theories, the chinese have covered up…

Read more…
3 Replies · Reply by David Benson 4 hours ago

Stolen Logo

Few weeks ago i had a call from West Sussex Police asking if i had a white Transit as it had been used in a crime. I was shocked as i have never been to West SussexI forgot about it until now where i thought id google myself, we all do that right?…

Read more…
7 Replies · Reply by Richard Matthews 14 hours ago