The industry body representing pre-cast concrete paving suppliers, Interpave, has joined others in the sector questioning the delay in the introduction of SuDS legislation. Here Interpave write:

Despite the recent extreme weather and floods, the Government has announced yet more delays in implementing sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) for new projects, aimed at reducing further flooding, through the 2010 Flood and Water Management Act.

However, SuDS experts have pointed out that impermeable surfaces on existing properties are contributing to downstream flooding now. Planning measures are already in place to help address the problem but local planning authorities need to prioritise enforcement.

Changes in Permitted Development rules have been in place for some time to encourage permeable solutions for new or replacement paving around existing buildings, as part of the fight against flooding.

Before the changes, paving anywhere in a garden related to a house or bungalow with any materials was considered to be ‘permitted development’ – effectively, an automatic planning permission without needing a planning application.

However, permitted development rights have been taken away from new or replacement drives or other hard surfaces, unless permeable paving is used or water drains onto a permeable area within the property.

Otherwise, planning permission will be required and this should be resisted on policy grounds.

These measures took effect in October 2008 in England and have applied from 30 September 2013 in Wales - in both cases applying to paving over 5m2 (although just for replacement paving in Wales) and in the front garden only.

For Scotland, similar measures apply to work initiated after 6 February 2012 and to areas of any size between the house and any street - therefore not just front gardens.

But it’s not just domestic drives that are affected. Similar measures have applied to industrial, warehouse, office and shop premises in England since April 2010 and they are being considered in Scotland as well.

All these measures rely on action now by local planning authorities in prioritising enforcement to have a real impact on downstream flood prevention in the future.

Of course, a small area of paving in isolation is not going to cause major flooding – but it is the cumulative impact of lots of areas around homes and commercial properties being sealed up that creates real problems.

For example, the Greater London Authority estimated that paving over front gardens for car parking that has already occurred in the city is equivalent to an area around 16 times the size of the new Olympic Park or the size of 5,200 football pitches.

Website: Interpave - SuDS law & standards

Related: Marshalls asks why SuDS legislation is not being enforced

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

Comments

  • wont make much of a difference ground will only take so much water (if any if clay) water will eventually lead to storm drains which are not big enough to cope and in many cases built early 1900's and not intended to manage the amount of water from all the additional buildings built since

This reply was deleted.

You need to be a member of Landscape Juice Network to add comments!

Join Landscape Juice Network

Open forum activity

IBRAN Limited updated their profile
5 hours ago
Tim Bucknall replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Moss and algae on hard surfaces
" Thanks folks, some useful suggestions there."
yesterday
Fusion Media posted a blog post
In the heart of picturesque Bakewell, the town’s Christmas Tree Team has found a revolutionary ally in the Pellenc Fixion 2 Tying Machine.Bakewell, nestled in the Derbyshire Dales, is renowned for its festive charm. Each year the Bakewell Christmas…
yesterday
Fusion Media posted a blog post
As we enter National Tree Week, there’s no better time to highlight the importance of sustainable tree care. Trees are vital to our environment, but their early years require protection from animals, harsh weather, and competing vegetation. While…
yesterday
Bryn Evans updated their profile
Monday
Bryn Evans updated their profile photo
Monday
Andy Crowther is now a member of Landscape Juice Network
Saturday
Landscape Juice replied to Aaron Bullus's discussion Tiny robot rigby Taylor
"Are you able to provide a few more details?  Maybe things like the number of hours you've used it, where you are based, what jobs you've used it on?"
Saturday
Miro Lazarini updated their profile
Saturday
robert pryor replied to Edward baker's discussion Rough cut mower recommendations
"Yes, this an upsetting drawback with no solution I can see. Maybe send in reptile beaters before strimming"
Saturday
Sam Bainbridge replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Plus it doesn't matter if we all know plants are better value. I'd make the point of this to the customer but if they want trough grown at the extra cost that's their choice I'd just do it"
Saturday
Sam Bainbridge replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"I've done 5ft Thorne troughs. Very easy to plant just got a mini digger dug the trench then drop them in couldn't be easier however £250 per m does seem expensive. "
Saturday
Tim Wallach replied to Aaron Bullus's discussion Tiny robot rigby Taylor
"I have no actual use for it but the viral marketing/ graffiti opportunities would be remarkable
 "
Friday
Aaron Bullus posted a discussion
Thought I'd sign up to this forum. And I hope I'm allowed to post stuff for sale on here as this will be a one off? I have for sale a tiny pro robot, it's not the new edition but it's the bigger one of the two. If anyone is interested then please…
Friday
Aaron Bullus is now a member of Landscape Juice Network
Friday
Intelligent Gardening replied to Marc Ollerenshaw's discussion Insurance
"NFU are very exensive but are very good when it comes to making a claim apparently... but hopefully never have to. I was looking for a combined policy to cover all insurances but according to my broker there isnt one so I end up paying a broker fee…"
Nov 21
More…