An ecology consultancy has been fined for safety failings after an employee broke her back in a fall at a former psychiatric hospital site in Essex.

The 34-year-old ecologist, who doesn’t wish to be named, was surveying the loft space for wildlife in one of the derelict buildings at Severalls Hospital in Colchester on 12 May 2014 when she fell nearly four metres through a loft hatch to a concrete floor.

She sustained a fractured vertebra at the base of her back and was in Colchester general hospital for seven days. She needed to wear a back brace for three months to prevent bending or twisting between her neck and waist and was unable to work for several weeks.

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) today (10 March) prosecuted DF Clark Bionomique Ltd after an investigation found that the company, which had been employed to carry out a survey while part of the site was being sold for redevelopment, hadn’t assessed the work to be undertaken properly.

Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court heard that although the company was aware that the hospital buildings had not been used or maintained since the site closed in 1997, the assessment was too general and failed to identify the risks of falling through what was likely to be fragile and rotting timberwork in the disused loft spaces.

DF Clark Bionomique Ltd, of Andrews Farm, Burnham Road, Althorne, Essex, was fined a total of £12,000 and ordered to pay costs of £1,138.50 after pleading guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and Regulation 4(1) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005.

After the case, HSE Inspector Edward Crick said: “The failure of DF Clark Bionomique Ltd to properly plan this wildlife survey has resulted in a significant injury to one of its employees. This is a company which undertakes surveys in locations ranging from a tree, to something considerably more complex such as the one being undertaken at the old Severalls hospital site.

“A ‘one size fits all’ approach is obviously not suitable and the company’s tick-box approach to risk assessment failed to protect this worker.

“Falling through fragile surfaces is a well-known risk, particularly in the construction industry, and any work at height needs to be properly assessed and managed, including sometimes seeing if the work needed can be done in a way that avoids any work at height at all.”

For more information about working safely at height, visit http://www.hse.gov.uk/work-at-height/index.htm

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Landscape Juice Network to add comments!

Join Landscape Juice Network

Open forum activity

Paul Errington replied to Mitchel ingham's discussion Winter and spring ideas for work
"One of our landscape machinery customers used to organize labour for snow clearance operations at Heathrow Airport. Those who signed up were paid to do training days, and received a very generous hourly rate if they attended a snow event. Problem…"
7 hours ago
Billybop replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"Hi yes I still have my 6500 Ego too, kept in case the newer one ever failed, but it hasn't. Had the 5 hundred-something cfm one before that, now flogged to a mate who loves it. The LB8800 is hovering around the £300 mark on amazon including import…"
Saturday
Sam Bainbridge replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"Just change to a backpack, br800 7yrs and not even a sparkplug yet"
Saturday
Clive replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"Stop using BG86s absolutely years ago first ego blower I had which is now my spare is the 6500 now have the 7650 which is brilliant. 
for large areas I have a back pack Stihl BR800 this combo does me "
Saturday
Adam Woods replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"I use a BGA50 - with 3 batteries rotating... each lasts around an hour - there is an AP version which probably has much better batteries. Then for heavy duty work a BR500. We bought that last year, and at the time looked at the BRA500 - but  with…"
Saturday
John F replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"When you say lately Tim have you considered fuel contamination ? 
Generally have always used the Stihl kombi with the ( blower attachment ) as a dedicated blower .
It does play up so i take it to my repair guy who always manages to keep it going on…"
Saturday
Honey Badger replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"I've watched a few videos on the 9010 serious power knocks the socks of the br850.  I'm not a fan of 4mix engines.
20yrs with a blower that's Impressive.
I haven't managed to find a local dealer for echo I'd prefer to have a look first than buy…"
Friday
Peter sellers replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"We have run pb 8010's for four years without issue and also pb770"s for everyday use. The pb 9010 is 10% more powerful than the 8010 which in itself is an awesome blower and outperforms anything Stihl have. We are nearly all Echo kit now and have…"
Friday
Honey Badger replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"I use the husqvarna 525bx. I used to use bg86's (had 3), carbs were good for 3-4 years before failure. You can get cheap Chinese carbs. 525bx is a better machine, it doesn't turn in the hand because of the nozzle and is more powerful, I think its…"
Thursday
Billybop replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"Ego 7650 battery model has excellent power had it a few years now and has never missed a beat, I use the 7.5ah batteries with it, they have recently brought out a couple slightly more powerful but those have a fancy LED screen which would get…"
Thursday
Peter sellers replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"Echo are bombproof !!"
Thursday
Tim Bucknall posted a discussion
I've had a definite increase in machinery failing, and lately I've had a rash of BG86 blowers failing due to carburettor wear- something I've never come across before.  Has anyone else had issues like this?  What hand-held blowers would people…
Thursday
Sam Bainbridge replied to Peter sellers's discussion Making tax digital
"Let's face it this first year they will stamp there feet if you don't comply but won't do anything, next year will be the year"
Wednesday
Sam Wharton updated their profile photo
Dec 9
Ian Harvey replied to Peter sellers's discussion Making tax digital
"I suggest that everybody on here read the HMRC MTD Guidance notes.
HMRC base the requirement for MTD ITSA on prior year tax return figures, including any now-ceased income streams. No crystal balls involved."
Dec 9
Peter sellers replied to Peter sellers's discussion Making tax digital
"Good point about having a crystal ball re turnover. Like you say what can they do about it!"
Dec 8
More…

Making tax digital

Thought there might be some unaware of this. So briefly and I am not an accountant . As from 6th April 26 anyone who has income from self employment, rent from property etc or a combination that equates to a turnover of 50k or more (not profit) will…

Read more…
26 Replies · Reply by Sam Bainbridge on Wednesday
Views: 856