Autumn Statement Blues, or Learning Not To Like George

I’ve had two disappointments this week. The first has been the Leveson enquiry. I’d sort of hoped – irrationally – that the hacks giving evidence might have turned out to be sentient beings. It turns out that they’re as moronic and unpleasant as their illustrious organs. Why on earth am I surprised?

The second disappointment has been more profound. The forecasts included in yesterday’s Autumn Statement came as no great surprise, as the dead thump of various heavyweight chickens coming home to roost continues to reverberate around Westminster. The structural issues we are facing are of our own making and need long term solutions. These moments of crisis don’t come around often and present fantastic opportunities for radical change.

We are confronted instead by our leaders resorting to political type. Listening to the economically illiterate Ed Balls this morning was like stepping into Doc Brown's Delorean and heading back to the 80s. I was even more disappointed by George Osborne’s swipe at the Habitats Regulations, which was preceded by a little reported but damaging government retreat on marine reserves earlier this week. Is he really saying that economic growth is being constrained by this kind of legislation? It just looks like a cheap shot for the benefit of some of his own back-benchers, who also apparently hail from a different age. In response various conservation folk (including the RSPB) have understandably gone ballistic, and the prospects of any of them working with this “greenest ever” administration look remoter than ever.

I thought we had moved beyond all this. “Ecosystem services” can have an ascribable long term economic BENEFIT, which fact has, I thought, been recognized by government. I’m not talking about tourists visiting areas of outstanding natural beauty, but in a broader sense. Ecosystems can provide food and fuel. They can regulate climate and pollination, water and erosion. They can benefit psychological and physical health. There is a strong economic case for promoting healthy and attractive ecosystems, which the Minister for Biodiversity* would do well to educate some of his colleagues about. Protecting our environment isn't just an excuse for spending money on quangos, it's something we need to do for the benefit of all.

*Yes, we have one! Richard Benyon, pictured for you lest he ever come up in a particularly challenging Pub quiz.

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

Comments

  • hear hear. Green Government eh? what a travesty. The Tories show their true colours: big business comes first and woe betide anything that gets in its way. And as you say, they haven't even grasped that environmental protection can be good for the economy. I only hope that public outcry heads off some of the worst proposals...

  • I'm not particularly anti-Tory - just frustrated at the wasted opportunity to get so much done at the moment...

This reply was deleted.

You need to be a member of Landscape Juice Network to add comments!

Join Landscape Juice Network

Open forum activity

Bryn Evans updated their profile
2 hours ago
Bryn Evans updated their profile photo
2 hours ago
Andy Crowther is now a member of Landscape Juice Network
Saturday
Landscape Juice replied to Aaron Bullus's discussion Tiny robot rigby Taylor
"Are you able to provide a few more details?  Maybe things like the number of hours you've used it, where you are based, what jobs you've used it on?"
Saturday
Miro Lazarini updated their profile
Saturday
robert pryor replied to Edward baker's discussion Rough cut mower recommendations
"Yes, this an upsetting drawback with no solution I can see. Maybe send in reptile beaters before strimming"
Saturday
Sam Bainbridge replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Plus it doesn't matter if we all know plants are better value. I'd make the point of this to the customer but if they want trough grown at the extra cost that's their choice I'd just do it"
Saturday
Sam Bainbridge replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"I've done 5ft Thorne troughs. Very easy to plant just got a mini digger dug the trench then drop them in couldn't be easier however £250 per m does seem expensive. "
Saturday
Tim Wallach replied to Aaron Bullus's discussion Tiny robot rigby Taylor
"I have no actual use for it but the viral marketing/ graffiti opportunities would be remarkable
 "
Friday
Aaron Bullus posted a discussion
Thought I'd sign up to this forum. And I hope I'm allowed to post stuff for sale on here as this will be a one off? I have for sale a tiny pro robot, it's not the new edition but it's the bigger one of the two. If anyone is interested then please…
Friday
Aaron Bullus is now a member of Landscape Juice Network
Friday
Intelligent Gardening replied to Marc Ollerenshaw's discussion Insurance
"NFU are very exensive but are very good when it comes to making a claim apparently... but hopefully never have to. I was looking for a combined policy to cover all insurances but according to my broker there isnt one so I end up paying a broker fee…"
Thursday
Amy is now a member of Landscape Juice Network
Thursday
Peter sellers replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Agree with you Graham, we have a client with a long run of Laurel which we only cut once a year mid june and have done for over 20 years, the client is fussy with a capital F ! It's a superb evergreen hedge which is bomb proof.
As to this so called…"
Wednesday
Graham Taylor replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Disagree there!  I maintain a site with a couple of of large laurel hedges and one cut in July suffices and keeps it looking nice.  Agree.... looks nasty immediately after cutting but quickly perks up so you don't notice the cut leaves.  Pretty much…"
Nov 19
Duncan Neville replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Thanks Tim"
Nov 19
More…