PRO

The United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) has accredited the first validation/verification bodies for Woodland Carbon Code (WCC) projects.

The WCC was launched in July 2011 to help give credibility to woodland creation schemes which are specifically aimed at carbon sequestration. The first two bodies to be granted UKAS accreditation under ISO 14065 to audit woodland creation schemes for the WCC are Scottish Food Quality Certification Ltd (SFQC) and SGS UK Ltd.

Welcoming the announcement of the accreditations, Tim Rollinson, Director-General of the Forestry Commission, said, “One of the most popular ways of compensating for carbon emissions is to plant trees, which capture or ‘sequester’ carbon, taking it out of the atmosphere.

However, the validity of some previous schemes has been questioned: are the right varieties of trees being planted? How long before they are cut down? Or do they even exist at all? The detailedrequirements of the WCC, supported by rigorous assessments which come with UKAS accreditation of the assessors, or auditors, will help to deliver confidence in the integrity and effectiveness of woodland creation projects in the UK which make claims about carbon capture.”

The WCC requires full details of the types and areas of woodland to be created at a particular location, and about how they will be managed. It specifies how the amount of carbon sequestered should be predicted and measured, as well as making allowances for events such as fire or disease.

There is a particular emphasis on “additionality”, a concept which seeks to ensure that the trees would not just have been planted in any event. Developers of woodland creation projects for certification against the WCC are able to register with the Forestry Commission. The details will be publicly available so that carbon sequestration claims can be verified. The validation/verification bodies will check that the claims made by the woodland creation project proposers comply with the WCC.

Janet Gascoigne, Accreditation Manager, Development at UKAS said. “The granting of the first two accreditations to this new standard is a key step towards both business and the public being able to recognise, understand and trust what carbon capturing schemes can do for them. It also provides another example of the effectiveness of accreditation as an alternative to regulation, not just in the environmental field but across a wide variety of industry sectors.”

As the UK’s National Accreditation Body, UKAS’s role within the scheme is to accredit validation/verification bodies to the requirements of the standard ISO 14065. The scheme is now open to other applicant validation/verification bodies following the successful completion of the pilot project with SGS and SFQC.

For details on how to become an accredited verification body please visit the UKAS website http://www.ukas.com/about-accreditation/apply-for-accreditation/Apply_for_Accreditation.asp

For further information on UKAS and accredited organisations please visit ww.ukas.com

For more information on the WCC please visit www.forestry.gov.uk/carboncode

UKAS

The United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) is the sole national body recognised by government
to assess evaluating organisations to international standards. UKAS operates under a Memorandum of
Understanding (MoU) with the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), and is a non-profit-
distributing company limited by guarantee. UKAS accreditation involves assessment and verification (against
international standards) of certification, inspection, testing and calibration services. UKAS employs over 300
assessors and technical experts, and has over 40 years’ experience. For further information about UKAS visit:
www.ukas.com

Woodland Carbon Code

  1. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the most common of the greenhouse gases causing the atmospheric warmin
  2. which is changing Earth’s climate. Growing trees sequester, or absorb, CO 2 from the atmosphere, and use
  3. carbon atoms to form wood while emitting oxygen back to the atmosphere.
  4. Projects can only be validated/verified under the Woodland Carbon Code if they meet its rigorous requirements for sound forest management, sustainability and carbon ‘accounting’. It uses independent validation/verification companies approved, or accredited, by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) to audit project proposals.
  5. ‘Registration’ of a proposed planting project under the Code is the first step towards ‘validation’ and ‘verification’. Once registered, the proposal is audited against the standards set down by the Code, and if it satisfies the requirements it is ‘validated’ under the Code. Projects must subsequently be ‘verified’ at least every 10 years to check that targets are being met.
  6. Certification provides evidence of the quality of the proposal, not only in carbon terms, but also in sustainable forest management terms, and is critical for attracting investors. Woodland established under the Code must attain high standards of forest management in line with the UK Forestry Standard (UKFS) and Climate Change Guidelines for forestry. The UKFS sets out the government vision of sustainable forest management, and is the ‘yardstick’ used by all four governments in the UK when assessing applications for forestry grants, tree felling licences and approvals of forest design plans. About 13 per cent of the UK’s land area is covered by woodland, which is more than double the woodland cover of 100 years ago. The European Union average is 37 per cent.

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –
PRO

Phil

You need to be a member of Landscape Juice Network to add comments!

Join Landscape Juice Network

Open forum activity

Bryn Evans updated their profile
yesterday
Bryn Evans updated their profile photo
yesterday
Andy Crowther is now a member of Landscape Juice Network
Saturday
Landscape Juice replied to Aaron Bullus's discussion Tiny robot rigby Taylor
"Are you able to provide a few more details?  Maybe things like the number of hours you've used it, where you are based, what jobs you've used it on?"
Saturday
Miro Lazarini updated their profile
Saturday
robert pryor replied to Edward baker's discussion Rough cut mower recommendations
"Yes, this an upsetting drawback with no solution I can see. Maybe send in reptile beaters before strimming"
Saturday
Sam Bainbridge replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Plus it doesn't matter if we all know plants are better value. I'd make the point of this to the customer but if they want trough grown at the extra cost that's their choice I'd just do it"
Saturday
Sam Bainbridge replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"I've done 5ft Thorne troughs. Very easy to plant just got a mini digger dug the trench then drop them in couldn't be easier however £250 per m does seem expensive. "
Saturday
Tim Wallach replied to Aaron Bullus's discussion Tiny robot rigby Taylor
"I have no actual use for it but the viral marketing/ graffiti opportunities would be remarkable
 "
Friday
Aaron Bullus posted a discussion
Thought I'd sign up to this forum. And I hope I'm allowed to post stuff for sale on here as this will be a one off? I have for sale a tiny pro robot, it's not the new edition but it's the bigger one of the two. If anyone is interested then please…
Friday
Aaron Bullus is now a member of Landscape Juice Network
Friday
Intelligent Gardening replied to Marc Ollerenshaw's discussion Insurance
"NFU are very exensive but are very good when it comes to making a claim apparently... but hopefully never have to. I was looking for a combined policy to cover all insurances but according to my broker there isnt one so I end up paying a broker fee…"
Thursday
Amy is now a member of Landscape Juice Network
Thursday
Peter sellers replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Agree with you Graham, we have a client with a long run of Laurel which we only cut once a year mid june and have done for over 20 years, the client is fussy with a capital F ! It's a superb evergreen hedge which is bomb proof.
As to this so called…"
Nov 20
Graham Taylor replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Disagree there!  I maintain a site with a couple of of large laurel hedges and one cut in July suffices and keeps it looking nice.  Agree.... looks nasty immediately after cutting but quickly perks up so you don't notice the cut leaves.  Pretty much…"
Nov 19
Duncan Neville replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Thanks Tim"
Nov 19
More…