LJN Blog Posts

Comments

• 

  T & S Plants May 14, 2010 at 1:16am

  Ah yes, the MP famous for the "NannyGate expenses scandal".
  
  This Tory MP was found by the Commons Standards and Privilages Commitee to have misued her allowances in 1997-1998 to pay for her Nannying work, in other words, we paid for her!
  
  It is alledged that in 2009 she claimed £40,000 for cleaning and bills (though not gardening work as I understand) for her constituency home, despite her husband, a senior partner in Accenture, claiming it was their main home.
  
  It is also alleged that Mrs Spelman co-owns with her husband, Spelman, Cormack & Associates, a food and biotechnology business.
  
  From what I can gather, Mrs Spelman voted against workers in Horticulture taking home the National Minimu Wage when it came before the Commons, but I stand to be corrected, and who knows in this changed world, she may have even changed her mind?
  
  The question we in Horticulture need ask, is this the right and proper person to be heading our industry?
  
  If not, as we are told that we in a "new politics" why can't we in Horticulture choose our own representitive from a selection of candidates.
  
  So Dick, ( an unfortunate combination of Dave and Nick) do we have new politics, and a say in our industry, or not?
• 

  Fenlandphil May 14, 2010 at 6:09am

  Obviously the good people of Meriden were not bothered enough by Mrs Spelman's activities to evict her so we have to accept the decision.
  As to accountability, there now at least seems to be a concensus that some form of PR is desirable, one positive result from a hung parliament. Whether or not a government that represents collectively more than 50% of the electorate makes a better job of managing the country than one with the support of less than 40% of the voters, we will have to wait and see.
  I hope it does, we deserve decent representative government, I haven't seen it for the last forty odd years.
• 

  chris nangle May 15, 2010 at 3:30pm

  Farm-Gate : Spelman’s Agri-Business, Bio-Tech Lobbying Past
  
  On the campaign trail David Cameron said
  
  “It is the next big scandal waiting to happen. It’s an issue that crosses party lines and has tainted our politics for too long, an issue that exposes the far-too-cosy relationship between politics, government, business and money.”
  
  This week Cameron appointed Caroline Spelman to be the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Obviously he feels that nanny-gate is all water under the bridge. Spelman’s long history in agricultural politics and lobbying somehow makes her an ideal candidate for the job in his judgment.
  
  Spelman spent her days before becoming an MP in the agri-business, with a lobbying focus mainly on sugar beet, one of the most heavily subsidised crops in Europe. She was the Sugar Beet Commodity Secretary for the NFU in the early eighties before becoming Deputy Director of the International Confederation of European Beet Growers. Seemingly well connected in the field, Caroline and her husband Mark went on to set up “Spelman, Cormack & Associates” in 1989 as a food and bio-technology lobbying company.
  
  For over ten years the new Secretary of State, along with her husband, lobbied the very department she now runs. Caroline resigned as a director less than a year ago and conveniently transferred her share of the company to her husband. The company address was also changed from her constituency home, for which Spelman claimed around £40,000 on expenses for cleaning and bills, to their million pound London flat. According to the company accounts last year, no rent was paid on this “office” subsidised by the taxpayers.
  
  Mark Spelman, who was also a Tory candidate (unsuccessful), uses both his name and his wife’s maiden name (Cormack) on his firm’s letterhead – that won’t hinder business. After all, the Minister who is now the number one target to be lobbied has her name on the company letterhead. Caroline Spelman lobbied for the industry and is now in charge of negotiating quotas, subsidies and price tariffs with the EU Agricultural Council. Her “family firm” deals with bio-tech clients that the Secretary of State is now responsible for regulating in the GM foods sector. As a result of anti-competitive EU regulations and industry lobbying British consumers are forced to pay prices for sugar which are massively inflated in comparison to the rest of the world. Did Cameron know that she was so recently a shareholder in a lobbying firm focused on Defra before he appointed her to the position? Because the whole thing taints politics and shows the far-too-cosy relationship between lobbyists, government, business and money…