On 5th March 2013, the Ecosystem Markets Task Force published its Final Report.

The report states the business case for why nature matters. It makes practical recommendations for both Government and business where interventions would assist in the creation and development of new markets, enhancing opportunities for growth that also benefit the environment.

The report affirms that business is often unaware of its true reliance on nature, and that a new approach is needed to maximise opportunities and manage future risks.

The Report highlights 5 ‘headline’ or priority recommendations, as follows:

1)         Biodiversity Offsetting: securing net gain for nature from planning and  development

2)         Closing the loop: anaerobic digestion and bioenergy on farms

3)         Local woodfuel supply chains: active sustainable management supporting local economies

4)         Nature-based certification and labelling: connecting consumers with nature

5)         Water cycle catchment management: integrating nature into water, waste water and flood management.

For each recommendation the Report highlights the size of the opportunity, both in terms of its economic value and its potential benefits to nature.

In arriving at these recommendations the Task Force has been looking for priorities that will deliver both opportunities to business and real gains to nature. As part of this process, a significant evidence base has been generated over the last year which has helped to inform Task Force thinking, including wide-ranging analysis of all the opportunity areas set out here.

Next steps

The Government will issue its official response to the Task Force’s report later this year. In the meantime Task Force members will continue to work with business leaders and organisations such as CBI, BITC and Cambridge Natural Capital Leaders Platform to get nature firmly onto business agendas. The Task Force would like to reconvene in one year’s time for a discussion with Government and other business leaders to assess progress since the Task Force’s report, and possible ways forward.

 

INTERIM REPORT NOVEMBER 2012

On 6th November 2012, the Ecosystem Markets Task Force published its Interim Report. The report sets out the aims of the Task Force, its emerging thinking on why nature should matter to business and the potential opportunities for business from valuing nature correctly.

The goods and services that nature provides, natural assets like water, crops, pollination and biodiversity underpin the success of every business. The increasing pressure on resources and our natural environment is already opening up fresh risks, but also potentially significant opportunities for business in brand new and developing markets.

The Task Force is focusing further work in the lead up to its final report into four areas, which it believes to have high value both for nature and business: (1) the water cycle; (2) the food cycle; (3) markets for carbon and nature; and (4), natural capital – resource scarcity and resilience.

In its final report, the Task Force will develop a set of recommendations for Government and business:  setting out practical suggestions for business to pursue. It will make recommendations for Government where intervention would assist in the creation of new markets, enhancing opportunities for growth and the environment.

The Task Force would like to engage as many businesses and other stakeholders as possible to help shape the ‘business view’ to Government in this important area. In the coming weeks discussion papers on our four areas of focus will be available on this website.

The Final Report of the Task Force will be published in early 2013.

Click here to download the Ecosystem Markets Task Force – Interim Report.

 

UPDATE PAPER on the Task Force’s work July2012 – click here

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Landscape Juice Network to add comments!

Join Landscape Juice Network

Open forum activity

Bryn Evans updated their profile
yesterday
Bryn Evans updated their profile photo
yesterday
Andy Crowther is now a member of Landscape Juice Network
Saturday
Landscape Juice replied to Aaron Bullus's discussion Tiny robot rigby Taylor
"Are you able to provide a few more details?  Maybe things like the number of hours you've used it, where you are based, what jobs you've used it on?"
Saturday
Miro Lazarini updated their profile
Saturday
robert pryor replied to Edward baker's discussion Rough cut mower recommendations
"Yes, this an upsetting drawback with no solution I can see. Maybe send in reptile beaters before strimming"
Saturday
Sam Bainbridge replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Plus it doesn't matter if we all know plants are better value. I'd make the point of this to the customer but if they want trough grown at the extra cost that's their choice I'd just do it"
Saturday
Sam Bainbridge replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"I've done 5ft Thorne troughs. Very easy to plant just got a mini digger dug the trench then drop them in couldn't be easier however £250 per m does seem expensive. "
Saturday
Tim Wallach replied to Aaron Bullus's discussion Tiny robot rigby Taylor
"I have no actual use for it but the viral marketing/ graffiti opportunities would be remarkable
 "
Friday
Aaron Bullus posted a discussion
Thought I'd sign up to this forum. And I hope I'm allowed to post stuff for sale on here as this will be a one off? I have for sale a tiny pro robot, it's not the new edition but it's the bigger one of the two. If anyone is interested then please…
Friday
Aaron Bullus is now a member of Landscape Juice Network
Friday
Intelligent Gardening replied to Marc Ollerenshaw's discussion Insurance
"NFU are very exensive but are very good when it comes to making a claim apparently... but hopefully never have to. I was looking for a combined policy to cover all insurances but according to my broker there isnt one so I end up paying a broker fee…"
Thursday
Amy is now a member of Landscape Juice Network
Thursday
Peter sellers replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Agree with you Graham, we have a client with a long run of Laurel which we only cut once a year mid june and have done for over 20 years, the client is fussy with a capital F ! It's a superb evergreen hedge which is bomb proof.
As to this so called…"
Nov 20
Graham Taylor replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Disagree there!  I maintain a site with a couple of of large laurel hedges and one cut in July suffices and keeps it looking nice.  Agree.... looks nasty immediately after cutting but quickly perks up so you don't notice the cut leaves.  Pretty much…"
Nov 19
Duncan Neville replied to Duncan Neville's discussion Instant hedging
"Thanks Tim"
Nov 19
More…