BCPC opposes arbitrary pesticide reduction targets

[PRESS RELEASE]

BCPC has issued a comprehensive response to Defra's recent Consultation on the implementation of EU pesticides legislation, highlighting some 40 key points and focussing in particular on risk assessment, water protection, research and education. Completely opposing the introduction of a pesticide reduction target, BCPC feels that pesticide policy in the UK should continue to focus on limiting pesticide use to the minimum necessary to provide effective control and reduce identified risks to human health or the environment. Some EU Members States having already set arbitrary pesticide reduction targets, but BCPC has consistently argued against such an illogical and unscientific approach. It asserts that it is the method, timing and frequency of application that are the key determinants of risk, rather than the amounts of product or active ingredients used. In this context, BCPC is not in favour of prohibiting the use of pesticides in public and conservation areas. With the appropriate risk assessments already built into the product approval process, it regards minimising use as being a far more cost-effective approach than looking to develop alternative control methods for weed, pests and disease control. Similarly, unless specified in the product's approval, it feels that signage – where the public has access to sprayed areas – is inappropriate and may even cause unnecessary alarm. With regards to the proposals on water protection, BCPC favours building on existing measures developed under the Voluntary Initiative. It points out that this approach will require significant R&D and special attention will also need to be given to developing specific guidance for some amenity situations and improving labelling of relevant products. “We have referred to the need for R&D several times in our response and we believe that this is a crucial area which needs to be revitalized in the UK in the future,” says Dr Colin Ruscoe, chairman of BCPC . “As well as providing advanced level training for practitioners, we need to deal with the current lack of good quality crop protection specialists, who are needed to undertake the necessary R&D so that UK pesticide policy can be implemented in the most effective way. This is a critical requirement if we are to deliver sustainable increases in food production in the face of both demand and the reducing armoury of crop protection products resulting from EU legislation.” 6 May 2010

What do people find is the best lawn turf? I use Rolawn Medallion. Sometimes it's excellent, sometimes less so (in particular it can contain AMG). What have people found consistently good?Cheers

"Morning Peter.thankyou for your reply. The op delay was out of my hands unfortunately,admin in the hospitals had got lost,that's from last June unfortunately.so,moving forward, I'm not ,I'm still on a waiting list to see the surgeon,so in the…"

"Seems good value Peter having Two batteries .
Suffering from bouts of tennis elbow it would have being ideal at the time , The lightest I could find was the Gtech weighing around 2.14 kg with battery in which enabled me to carry on working .
It's…"

LJN Blog Posts

BCPC opposes arbitrary pesticide reduction targets

Comments

Highlighted blog posts

The Landscape Juice Network's Aims and Objectives

A Quick Reminder to Talk

Diversity in the Horticulture Industry

The Impact of Burglary on the Individual

The LJN Big Interview with Westhill Garden & Landscaping Ltd

Starting a gardening or landscaping business?

Note: this page contains paid content.

Open forum activity

Turf

Stihl hsa40 review

Hadn’t prepared for this

Cordless hedge cutter

Note: this page contains paid content.

More on LJN

Featured business articles

About LJN