PRO

Summer ball, Platt Fields, ManchesterAS landscapers or garden designers you are going to want potential clients see examples of your work by displaying photographs of your projects.

These could be simple before and after type shots, or close ups of particular methods you used, however, you also want to make sure people find them via search engines.

There are a couple of things you can do to make it easier for search spiders to find your images, but more importantly tell what the actual photograph is about.

Give your image a title

The first thing to do is to change the default name your camera provides once you have downloaded your image to your computer, often it is something like 'dsc00887.jpg' which doesn't tell us a great deal.

So after you have edited your image save the new one with a more descriptive name, something like 'rose-garden-norwich.jpg' as you can see this both describes the pic and offers up a location.

You'll see that I also split the words up with a 'dash' again this lets search engines read what the pic is all about.

If a search engine can find your image then so too could a potential client...which could lead to being commissioned.
A quick aside on editing the image.

Your camera software most probably has a simple image editor built in, or you may want to try Google's Picasa or the free PhotoScape, whatever you use try and keep in mind some simple dimensions for your photos.

Images don't need to be as high quality as in a magazine and many cameras, by default, provide an original image that if you printed it off would be about A4 size, clearly we don't need that on the web.

So I would suggest that your images don't need to be any more than about 500 pixels wide with a file size of around 75kb, you won't lose a great deal in quality.

I've loaded up the same image in two different dimensions to provide a comparison and to give you an idea of how little difference there is when viewed on a computer screen:

Large image of summer ball

Smaller image of summer ball

I also think this could help a little in reducing the illegal use of images by other websites.

For a start you could still include a website address in the bottom corner of your image as a type of watermark, but you are also not providing someone with a full size image that they can do want they want with.

I think the majority of people are pretty honest and will link back and mention the source of the image if they use it on their site - some won't, but they are crooks and whatever you try to do they will attempt to rip you and many others off.

To a degree as search engines improve and more people link to you, the person who has the original image or the more reputable online presence is likely to see their images appear higher in search engine results.

As you can see it's not an exact science, however, there is one last thing you can do to help your images be found.

Images also have alt tags, they look like this: alt="Rose garden" and you will see them when an image does not load properly.

The other tag connected with images is called the title tag, but it does not feature within the image properties on the network, but it is the one you see when you hover your mouse over a pic.

Again search engines use these to understand what an image is about, so if you wanted more locally based searches to prove popular your alt tag could read:

alt="Rose garden Brighton"

In fact I recently crossed a very useful article from Google themselves on improving your site for search engines, as well as the use of alt tags in images, take a few minutes to check out the video below.


Unfortunately the Ning service doesn't complete the alt tag automatically when you add an image to an article, it could use the image name for example, hopefully in time this will be the case.

In the mean time you can do it yourself, so once you've uploaded your image there will be a line of code and you will see, alt="" click between the quote marks and add a few words of descriptive text.

Don't stuff the alt tag full of words that have no relation to the image trying to trick the search engines, it won't work, all you need is a short phrase and maybe a location.

In the end though if you have taken a little time to write an interesting article or a helpful paragraph or two describing your image, this will help both search engines track you down but more importantly entertain and inform your readers.

Related article: Tips on using the Landscape Juice Network

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

Comments

  • That's a really useful article, thanks Craig. All I need now is a time machine to give me a couple of spare days to sort out my site! ;-D
  • PRO
    Hi Andrew

    Glad it proved helpful, might struggle to sort out the time machine I'm afraid ;-)

    All I would say to help speed things up is try and stick to a set formula; all images the same width, placed in the same way on pages, captioned in the same way.

    You can always go back into the page and make any tweaks during quiet times (although I must admit these seem less common nowadays!!!)

    All the best
    Craig
  • PRO
    Hi Stuart
    Both Google Analytics and StatCounter are good services.
    As you've most probably seen Analytics provides an endless amount of details, while StatCounter is good at providing a snapshot.
    Why they display different readings? Only the people behind the software would know that as their methods of measurement are different.
    Also you write that the tracking codes are on your home page, I might have read it wrong, but are you able to place the codes on all your pages?
    If you have a common file across your whole site, maybe your header graphic or left links, place the code here and it should measure traffic across the whole of your site.
    Hope this helps
    Craig
  • PRO
    Hi Dwayne, congratulations you spotted the deliberate mistake ;-)

    You are right, think I was full of alts, titles and tags at the time, I've edited the piece to correct the error.

    On the image resizing options, I have used Web Risizer in the past and I also noticed this one Resize2Mail - might have to write a mini post up about these.

    All the best, Craig
  • PRO
    I also use Picnik (a Craig recommendation to me a while back). Picnik has a great feature that lets you right click and edit a web picture or take a full page screenshot allowing you to crop out any part of the page without loss of quality.
  • PRO
    And converting comments into articles is one of my favourite tricks, so I've put together a short piece titled:

    Image resizing tools to help your photographs
  • PRO
    In case anyone is wondering where Craig is and why he hasn't posted for a while. It's because he has moved here to France and now lives about twenty five minutes from me here,

    We have had a couple of meetings thus far and we had look round the network together.

    Craig is still without regular Internet access.

    Naming images

    I am seeing a lot of photographs being added that do not have titles. I cannot emphasise enough how important this is for you (not me, YOU).

    Google indexes all images using the title tag and the alt tag so anyone searching for something in particular might just find your site if your image is indexed according to its particular topic.

    Please look through your portfolio and edit the title if necessary.

    Phil
  • PRO
    Please remember to add a title to your images. It means that the image is indexed for our own site search but it also means that the image is indexed on the WWW and can bring visitors to us, but more importantly you, if they are looking for related content.
  • PRO
    Not everyone is making the most of the SEO potential when adding photographs - please have a read or re-read of this blog post for some tips and pointers.
  • Hi Craig

    Thanks so much for this ...really useful and all in language even I can understand !

    Recently our old website was penalised by google (penguin update) as our seo guy was doing things wrong. We have had to build a new site at great expense and we are doing a lot of the seo ourselves : www.davidandersen.co.uk.
    Of course these things take time ...but tips like yours really help.
    Best of luck with life in France (I am jealous!) David

This reply was deleted.

You need to be a member of Landscape Juice Network to add comments!

Join Landscape Juice Network

Open forum activity

Kerry Parfitt posted a discussion
Hi all whats the best treatment for them dandelions on a lawn please and a possible feed thanks
4 hours ago
Clive replied to Dan Nate's discussion Charging Stihl tools from the van
"Exactly, you are running them flat working at a clients so charge them there. No need for the unnecessary expense "
7 hours ago
John Elliott replied to Dan Nate's discussion Charging Stihl tools from the van
"I charge at customers on a Stihl fast charger if they have an outside socket but also have multiple batteries as well when I haven't got access to power."
11 hours ago
Intelligent Landscapes replied to Jason Taylor's discussion Lawn / soil problem
" 1) Assuming your client has just moved into the house, ask their solictors to check the terms of the sale contract, what obligations do the developers/sellers have under the contract regarding the garden condition?
2) Investigate the reason for the…"
12 hours ago
Neil Darby replied to Dan Nate's discussion Charging Stihl tools from the van
"I charge on site if need be, or at home first, depending on how long I am at the job, which are mostly half days. I only spend 15 minutes max dringing to/from home so no way I could charge in the van even if I wanted to go down that route. Most…"
14 hours ago
Andrew Betteridge replied to Jason Taylor's discussion Lawn / soil problem
"Around here in Worcestershire it's £4 per tonne plus VAT for bulk product, with delivery charge on top.  Minimum quantity for delivery is 8 tonnes.
So it is not expensive to buy and is lightweight, so easy to handle. One guy I used to work for…"
yesterday
Distance replied to Jason Taylor's discussion Lawn / soil problem
"While I agree yes that would be ideal, what's that going to cost, anywhere from £1000-£2000? How is that going to get them out of this pickle, I very much doubt the customer would go for that. The rear tine rotavator is the answer, I have done a new…"
yesterday
Andrew Betteridge replied to Jason Taylor's discussion Lawn / soil problem
"Tiller or rotavator, it still the same mud.
Ten ton of the council soil improver from the household recycling mixed in with it would help, don't call it compost because it's not.
Edit- looking at the photo again, make it at least twenty tons."
Thursday
Peter sellers replied to Jason Taylor's discussion Lawn / soil problem
"Don't think you are paying attention, the original post was from Jason Taylor, I did not post the photo nor ask for any suggestions all I was doing was defending Jason's position in response to your unhelpful comments"
Wednesday
Honey Badger replied to Jason Taylor's discussion Lawn / soil problem
"Sorry Peter I have to go the distance. I own a tiller it will cut a foot, its bloody hard work and slow. I bet above is at least six passes. Large areas like that I'd hire a cannon. 3/4 passes it would cut to a foot and leave a fine tilth rather…"
Wednesday
Distance replied to Jason Taylor's discussion Lawn / soil problem
"Not how I describe it, it's what it is, a tiller. And and do me a favour 😆  nobody is criticising your work, I'm criticising the ineffectiveness of that tool. I can see it in the picture you have posted. You have posted asking for any suggestions.…"
Wednesday
Peter sellers replied to Jason Taylor's discussion Lawn / soil problem
"Sorry to be blunt but we have cultivated many acres with what you describe as a tiller over the last 40 years without the need to hire a rear tine rotovator, it's unfair to criticise someone elses work without knowing the circumstances and not what…"
Wednesday
Distance replied to Jason Taylor's discussion Lawn / soil problem
"Sorry to be blunt. But my bugbear is people referring to pathetic tillers as rotavators. "
Wednesday
Distance replied to Jason Taylor's discussion Lawn / soil problem
"Sorry but a Stihl mh585 is a tiller not a rotavator. Something I would use at the allotment not on a professional job. Something like a Barretto 13hp you can hire for £100 a day is a proper rotavator and will go deeper and turn all those clumps to…"
Wednesday
Distance is now a member of Landscape Juice Network
Wednesday
Fusion Media posted a blog post
Agrovista Amenity is enhancing its line marking capabilities with a major investment in robotic technology and key industry appointments. As part of this strategy, the company has secured an exclusive partnership with XDC Autonomous Solutions for…
Wednesday
More…